<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>LLM Governance on Bryan Chan</title><link>https://13ryanC.github.io/tags/llm-governance/</link><description>Recent content in LLM Governance on Bryan Chan</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.155.3</generator><language>en-gb</language><copyright>Bryan Chan</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://13ryanC.github.io/tags/llm-governance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Observability Trilemma: Why Cheap AI Monitors Fail and the Geometry of Deception</title><link>https://13ryanC.github.io/posts/blog/observability_trilemma/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://13ryanC.github.io/posts/blog/observability_trilemma/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note:&lt;/strong&gt; This post is a distilled overview of our paper submission to &lt;a href="https://apartresearch.com/project/the-sentinel-engine-solving-the-observability-trilemma-via-differential-precision-probing-noqd"&gt;Apart Research&amp;rsquo;s Technical Governance Hackathon&lt;/a&gt;, developed as a team effort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As AI models (i.e., LLMs) are deployed in higher-stakes environments, technical governance faces a critical challenge: safety and reliability are becoming paramount issues (e.g., &lt;a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.04664"&gt;hallucination&lt;/a&gt;). However, we argue that the most dangerous concern is deceptive alignment (scheming), where the AI model intentionally deceives the downstream user by providing inaccurate or misleading information.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>